Pt 53.299 Pd 41.414 Rh 276.496 Au 129.523 Ag 1.835

A. G. Metals Launches New Spark Plug Recycling Project for 2025

A. G. Metals is proud to announce the launch of a new project for 2025 focusing on the recycling of automobile spark plugs to recover their precious metals content. This initiative reflects our commitment to sustainability and innovation in precious metals recovery.

Historically, the financial feasibility of spark plug recycling was challenging due to the very low Platinum Group Metals (PGM) content. Until 2021, the process was largely unviable. However, with the significant rise in iridium prices in 2021, a few pioneering companies ventured into this niche recycling market. A. G. Metals is now joining this effort, driven by the potential for creating value in this untapped resource.

One of the main challenges is that not all spark plugs contain PGMs, complicating both sorting and processing. The economic feasibility of recycling spark plugs will likely vary based on geographic locations, logistical efficiencies, and local market dynamics.

Currently, A. G. Metals is in a learning stage. Our focus is on:

  1. Understanding the actual PGM content in different types of spark plugs.
  2. Addressing logistics challenges associated with collection and transportation.
  3. Identifying the most effective recycling and refining processes to maximize recovery and minimize costs.

We welcome any data, insights, or advice from industry experts, recyclers, and researchers to support us in overcoming these challenges and ensuring the success of this exciting initiative.

Together, we can pave the way for a more sustainable and economically viable future in spark plug recycling.

Invest in Silver

The Holy Land Mint

How to Calculate the Theoretical Density of an Alloy – And Why It Matters

By Ami Gur – A.G. Metals Ltd. One of the most common mistakes made when evaluating alloys is calculating density by simply averaging the densities of the constituent metals according to their weight percentages. Although this approach appears logical, it is incorrect. Understanding how to calculate the theoretical density of an alloy is a valuable skill for metallurgists, refiners, quality engineers, and anyone working with precious metals. When combined with XRF analysis, density measurement provides another practical tool for verifying alloy composition.

A Practical Example

Recently, while evaluating a silver-aluminum alloy, I noticed that the cast ingots appeared unusually light. The first question was simple: Does the measured density support the declared composition of 30 wt% Silver and 70 wt% Aluminum? Like many engineers, the first instinct is often to calculate: 30% × Silver density + 70% × Aluminum density This calculation gives a completely incorrect result because density is not a property that can be averaged by weight fraction.

The Correct Formula

For alloys where composition is expressed in weight percent, the theoretical density is calculated as: ρ = 1 / [(w₁ / ρ₁) + (w₂ / ρ₂) + …] Where:
  • ρ = theoretical alloy density
  • w = weight fraction of each element
  • ρ = density of each pure metal

Example

Silver density: 10.49 g/cm³ Aluminum density: 2.70 g/cm³ Composition:
  • 30 wt% Silver
  • 70 wt% Aluminum
Calculation: Density = 1 / [(0.30 / 10.49) + (0.70 / 2.70)] Theoretical density = approximately 3.47 g/cm³ Not 5.0 g/cm³ as obtained from the incorrect weighted-average calculation.

Why Is This Important?

Knowing the theoretical density allows you to:
  • Verify whether an alloy composition is reasonable.
  • Compare measured density with theoretical density.
  • Detect excessive casting porosity.
  • Identify possible contamination or incorrect alloying.
  • Support XRF and laboratory analytical results.
  • Improve quality control during production and refining.
Density alone does not identify every alloy, but it is an excellent verification tool when used together with chemical analysis.

Practical Considerations

Measured density is often slightly lower than the theoretical value because of:
  • Casting porosity
  • Shrinkage cavities
  • Oxide inclusions
  • Internal voids
  • Measurement uncertainty
For example, a measured density of 3.30 g/cm³ for a theoretical value of 3.47 g/cm³ may simply indicate a few percent porosity rather than an incorrect composition.

Final Thoughts

Even after more than 30 years working with precious metals and materials engineering, I still enjoy discovering—or rediscovering—fundamental engineering principles that have practical value in everyday work. A simple density calculation will never replace laboratory analysis, but it can provide an additional piece of evidence when evaluating an unknown alloy. Sometimes, the oldest engineering tools remain among the most useful. Real data. Real experience. No fluff.